F. Husson website
IntroductionPrincipal Component AnalysisCorrespondence Analysis Multiple Correspondence Analysis ClusteringMultiple Factor AnalysisTo concludeForum
Q1) After having a think about the definition of the groups of variables, the choice of status of each (active or supplementary), and whether or not to normalize the data in each group, give the percentage of inertia in the 1-2 plane of the Multiple Factor Analysis that you then run. 35.18 42.12 51.24 72.18
Q2) Which two groups of variables are the most related? Education - Happiness Education - Material well-being Material well-being - Health and safety Education - Health and safety Material well-being - Jobs
Q3) Which group contributes the most to construction of the 2nd dimension of the MFA? Material well-being Jobs Happiness Health and safety Education
Q4) Tick all true statements (with the help of the individuals and variables plots if necessary): Spain and Greece have high job security and high long-term unemployment rates The first axis puts countries like Denmark, where quality of life is high, to the right, and countries like Brazil, where the quality of life is lower, to the left France is an average country in terms of the quality of life criteria used in this survey Poland and Italy, close to each other in the individuals plot, are similar with respect to the set of groups of variables
Q5) Plot the graph of partial points and show only the partial points for France and Austria. With the help of the variables plot, select which statements are true: In terms of Material well-being, France and Austria are similar In terms of Jobs, France and Austria are similar In terms of Health and safety, France and Austria are similar The Education indices are very good for France
Q6) By playing with the colors, we can show the partial points of just one group. To do this, we select the 'transparent' color for all other groups (the color 'black' corresponds to the color of the average point). For example, if we want to color the partial points of the 1st group red, we write: plot(res.afm,partial="all", hab="group", cex=.7, palette = palette(c("black", "red", "transparent", "transparent", "transparent", "transparent")), ylim=c(-4,4)) Using this, show only the partial points of the Happiness group for all the countries, then tick each of the following statements if they are true: In Denmark, the people are generally happy Koreans are less happy that we would expect, given their quality of life indices (Jobs, Heath, Material well-being and Education) The Spanish are less happy that we would expect, given their quality of life indices (Jobs, Heath, Material well-being and Education) Koreans are generally happier than Brazilians Israelis have essentially the same level of happiness as Americans
Q7) If we ran a PCA for each group of variables, for which groups would the 1st dimension of the PCA have a positive correlation (and greater than 0.5) with the 1st dimension of the MFA? Material well-being Jobs Happiness Health and safety Education
Q8) Interpreting the data. There is no correction provided for this question.
Score = Correct answers: